Loading...
Loading...

Armored is a 2009 heist thriller directed by Nimród Antal from a first-ever spec script by James V. Simpson. It runs a lean 88 minutes and stars Matt Dillon as Cochrane and Columbus Short as Ty Hackett, a decorated Iraq war veteran raising his younger brother alone, alongside Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne, Skeet Ulrich, Milo Ventimiglia, Amaury Nolasco and Fred Ward as a crew of armoured truck guards who decide to rob their own employer.
I want to start with something I only discovered after watching it, because the timing is genuinely remarkable. Seventeen years after this film came out and quietly underperformed, it is currently climbing the streaming charts. As in right now, this week. An article published the same day I sat down to write this describes it as one of the biggest films on streaming at the moment. So either my timing is extraordinary or a great many of us are having the same idea simultaneously.
It is an interesting collection of actors in this, and they all did their job really well. Matt Dillon in particular played his part well, bringing a quiet, worn authority to Cochrane that holds the early stretch together. A critic at the time made the point that it is good to see old professionals like Dillon, Reno, Fishburne and Ward demonstrating to the younger members of the cast how to take potentially shop-worn material and make it their own, and that is precisely what is happening. Everybody here has done this a hundred times and knows exactly how to make it land.
Then there is Columbus Short, and this is the part of the film I have thought about most.
I came away convinced they were trying to build him into a massive superstar at the time, and the record bears that out. He and Dillon were announced as the two leads back in October 2007, a full two years before release. He was being positioned to carry the film, and the structure of the story makes him the moral centre and the last man standing.
Roughly 2007 to 2010 really was his moment. Which makes it genuinely sad to say that I could not tell you the last thing I saw him in.
I did go and check, and the answer is not a happy one. The role most people would know him from is Scandal, which he departed in 2014. There has not been anything approaching that level since. That window I was thinking about really was the window, and it closed.
Critics at the time were sharply divided about him, for what it is worth. Variety described him as capably taking the lead. Another review was considerably harsher, saying he fails to evoke any sympathy for a predicament he largely created himself. I landed somewhere in the middle. He is fine. The film simply never gives him the weight to carry.
Do you agree with this review?
Reviewed on October 21, 2026
A crew of officers at an armored transport security firm risk their lives when they embark on the ultimate heist against their own company. Armed with a seemingly fool-proof plan, the men plan on making off with a fortune with harm to none. But when an unexpected witness interferes, the plan quickly unravels and all bets are off.
For a single-location film, which this mostly is once it gets going, I enjoyed it a great deal. The bulk of the back half unfolds inside one abandoned warehouse as the crew turn on one another, and the confinement works in the film’s favour.
That is also not an accident. Antal had already built two films around confined spaces before this one, with Kontroll and Vacancy, and Variety explicitly noted that Armored continues that tradition. He went on from here to direct Predators. His direction here was described by reviewers as functional rather than inspired, though several conceded he invests considerably more in the look of the film than the material strictly required.
Which brings me to the detail that genuinely delighted me. A number of reviewers at the time described Armored as having a distinctly Reservoir Dogs feel to it. And the reason is simple. The cinematographer is Andrzej Sekuła, who shot Reservoir Dogs. He also shot Pulp Fiction. The resemblance is not homage, imitation or coincidence. It is the same man with the same eye.
I have plenty of small complaints. The plot improbabilities mount steadily, the body count becomes faintly ridiculous, and the Hollywood Reporter was right to describe the ending as a whimper of a disappointingly slack payoff. The last-man-standing structure flattens what had been a genuinely well-drawn set of relationships into fairly standard action movie machinery.
But overall, turn your brain off and enjoy it. It is brisk, it is tense enough, it is well shot and it does not outstay its welcome by a single minute.
Commercially it made $23.7 million against a $20 million budget, which is close to nothing after marketing. It also went out with no preview screenings for critics, a strategy studios use to avoid bad reviews landing before opening weekend, at the cost of all the publicity those reviews would have generated. It holds a 42 percent on Rotten Tomatoes and a Metascore of 50.
And now, seventeen years on, it is doing better on streaming than it ever managed in cinemas.
The Verdict
6/10 — Recommended
2015
Streaming on · US